Prediction of Sander Jong [824th] vs Stefan Peter Hampe [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Jong 1 - 0 Hampe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Hampe winning 1. The last match between Jong and Hampe was at the M15 Metzingen, 19-07-2022, First, Clay with Sander Jong getting the victory 7-5 5-7 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sander Jong | 1 |
| Stefan Peter Hampe | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
5
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:43:0 | Average Match Time | 2:43:0 |
| 66% (79/120) | 1st Serve % | 62% (64/104) |
| 73% (58/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (42/64) |
| 39% (16/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (45/104) | Return Points Win % | 38% (46/120) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sander Jong vs Stefan Peter Hampe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Hampe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Hampe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hampe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hampe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 10/ 5), with Hampe winning 54.55% (W/L 12/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11). Hampe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 23/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5), where as Hampe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Hampe being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Hampe winning 1. The last match between Jong and Hampe was at the M15 Metzingen, 19-07-2022, First, Clay with Sander Jong getting the victory 7-5 5-7 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Hampe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jong winning 1 times and Hampe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 0, and Hampe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 81.07 while Hampe has played against players with an average rank of 26.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hampe has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hampe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Sander Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Sander Jong
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Evan Palumbo
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sander Jong
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Adam Briant
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sasa Markovic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stefan Peter Hampe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-5 0-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-7(10) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Peter Hampe
Player
Facundo Bermejo
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Jong vs Hampe?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jong Vs Hampe is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (75/41) | Win/Loss | 56% (40/32) |
| 61% (157/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (93/73) |
| 55% (1345/1090) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (888/810) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 509 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 304 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1:29:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 191.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 21.83 |
| 62% (4209/6831) | 1st Serve % | 58% (787/1347) |
| 72% (3038/4209) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (523/787) |
| 50% (1314/2622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (277/560) |
| 46% (327/714) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (41/120) |
| 41% (2918/7080) | Return Points Win % | 37% (516/1396) |
| 65% (73/112) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (40/70) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 30% (10/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 70% (21/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 93% (71/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (46/38) |
| 6% (71/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (46/8) |
| 18% (45/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
